Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-04-10

U.P.C.U.E.F. Ltd vs Cane Commissioner & R.C.C.S. & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P.C.U.E.F. Ltd
Respondent
Cane Commissioner & R.C.C.S. & Ors
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the amendment to the definition of 'Crushing Season' in the U.P. Cane Cooperative Service Regulations, 1975, as per the order dated 17th May 1993, adversely affected the employment and wages of seasonal workers, violating their rights under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1956. The Court emphasized the necessity of providing notice under Section 4-I and Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act before altering employment conditions. The appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition and reinstating the previous definition of 'Crushing Season'.

U.P.C.U.E.F. Ltd vs Cane Commissioner & R.C.C.S. & Ors · Niyam