Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-09-17

CIDDAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM REDDY vs NAMAKARI MUNI REDDY .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/11725
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CIDDAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM REDDY
Respondent
NAMAKARI MUNI REDDY .
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE & DALVEER BHANDARI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Andhra Pradesh High Court erred in not framing a substantial question of law as required under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) before entertaining the second appeal. The Court emphasized that the High Court must specifically frame such questions at the time of admission and decide them during the hearing. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and directed it to frame the necessary substantial questions of law and dispose of the appeal within three months.

CIDDAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM REDDY vs NAMAKARI MUNI REDDY . · Niyam