Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-09-21

MD. SADIQ vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/13048
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MD. SADIQ
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the status of the Institute of Engineering and Rural Technology (IERT) in relation to the Uttar Pradesh Absorption of Retrenched Employees of Government/Corporations in Government Service Rules, 1991. The Court held that IERT is not an instrumentality of the State, thus the Absorption Rules do not apply to its employees. The judgment of the Allahabad High Court was upheld, confirming that retrenched employees who accepted compensation could not challenge the closure of IERT.

MD. SADIQ vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam