Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-09-17

Boodireddy Chandraiah And Ors vs Arigela Laxmi And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 380
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Boodireddy Chandraiah And Ors
Respondent
Arigela Laxmi And Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, D.K. Jain

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a second appeal can only be maintained if a substantial question of law is formulated, which the High Court must satisfy itself exists before proceeding. The Court emphasized that the right to appeal is a statutory right and must adhere strictly to the prescribed conditions, distinguishing between questions of law and substantial questions of law. The judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court allowing the second appeal without formulating such a question was set aside, reinforcing the procedural requirements for second appeals.

Boodireddy Chandraiah And Ors vs Arigela Laxmi And Anr · Niyam