Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-09-21

Mohammad Sadiq & Ors vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 30
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mohammad Sadiq & Ors
Respondent
State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Institute of Engineering and Rural Technology (IERT) is not an instrumentality of the State under Article 12 of the Constitution, thus the Uttar Pradesh Absorption of Retrenched Employees of Government/Corporations in Government Service Rules, 1991, does not apply to its employees. The Court found that the High Court's conclusion regarding IERT's status was correct, and the retrenched employees could not challenge the closure after accepting compensation. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's judgment.

Mohammad Sadiq & Ors vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors · Niyam