Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-09-10

Commissioner Of Central ... vs M/S. Damnet Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Etc

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central ...
Respondent
M/S. Damnet Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Etc
Author
B. Sudershan Reddy
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, B. Sudershan Reddy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal Nos. 3821-23 of 2005, addressed the validity of exemptions claimed by M/s. Danmet Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. under Notification No. 120/84-CE and Notification No. 175/86-CE. The Court held that the products 'CRC 2-26' and 'CRC Acryform' did not qualify for the exemptions as they did not meet the stipulated criteria, specifically regarding brand name restrictions and product classification. Consequently, the appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise were allowed, reversing the CESTAT's decision in favor of the respondent-assessee.

Commissioner Of Central ... vs M/S. Damnet Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Etc · Niyam