Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-10-31

VENEET AGRAWAL vs UNION OF INDIA .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/15727
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VENEET AGRAWAL
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA .
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR ASHOK BHAN
Bench
V.S. SIRPURKAR ASHOK BHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub Brokers) Rules and Regulations, 1992, affirming that they were validly enacted under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, particularly Section 31, which mandates that rules and regulations must be laid before Parliament. The Court clarified that the requirement of laying the rules before Parliament does not invalidate the rules if not complied with, provided they were otherwise enacted within the powers granted by the Act. The appeals against the High Court judgments were dismissed, affirming the legality of the SEBI regulations.

VENEET AGRAWAL vs UNION OF INDIA . · Niyam