Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-10-12

Shridevi & Anr vs Muralidhar & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2007 SC 342
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shridevi & Anr
Respondent
Muralidhar & Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the dispute over site No. 433 under the Bangalore Development Authority Act, specifically referencing Section 18 regarding land acquisition. The Court held that the appellant's title was valid as they purchased the site from the registered owner, Respondent No. 2, who had a possession certificate. The Court emphasized the importance of registered deeds and possession certificates in establishing ownership, ultimately dismissing the appeal against the Karnataka High Court's decision, thereby upholding the lower court's ruling.

Shridevi & Anr vs Muralidhar & Anr · Niyam