Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-10-09

Inder Mohan Goswami & Another vs State Of Uttaranchal & Others

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 251
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Inder Mohan Goswami & Another
Respondent
State Of Uttaranchal & Others
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
Chief Justice, R. V. Raveendran, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a sale agreement under Section 482 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that time is of the essence in contracts as per the principles established in Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Court held that the failure of the respondent to pay the balance amount within the stipulated time justified the cancellation of the agreement and forfeiture of the earnest money. Consequently, the non-bailable warrant issued against the appellants was deemed improper, leading to the quashing of the High Court's order.

Inder Mohan Goswami & Another vs State Of Uttaranchal & Others · Niyam