Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-10-22

Sanjay Bansal And Anr vs Jawaharlal Vats And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 207
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sanjay Bansal And Anr
Respondent
Jawaharlal Vats And Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the Allahabad High Court's directions in a writ petition under Article 226 concerning the investigation of a case under Section 307 IPC. The Court held that the High Court's order, which effectively directed the rejection of the final report submitted by the investigating officer, was not sustainable as it could unduly influence the trial court's independent decision-making. The Court emphasized that there is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for filing a protest petition by the informant, thus reinforcing the need for a fair investigation without judicial interference in the investigative process.

Sanjay Bansal And Anr vs Jawaharlal Vats And Ors · Niyam