Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-11-29

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Jaipur vs Rajasthan Spg. And Wvg. Mills Ltd., Etc. ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SC (SUPP) 1245
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Jaipur
Respondent
Rajasthan Spg. And Wvg. Mills Ltd., Etc. ...
Bench
S.H. Kapadia, B. Sudershan Reddy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the tribunal's decision that Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. (RSWML) was the real manufacturer of processed fabrics, affirming the genuineness of the lease agreement with Purvi Fabrics & Textures. The Court clarified that the valuation of excisable goods should be determined under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing that the normal price constitutes the basis of assessable value. The Court concluded that even if the comparable goods method was applied, RSWML's pricing practices were valid, thus supporting the tribunal's ruling on the cost method under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975.

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Jaipur vs Rajasthan Spg. And Wvg. Mills Ltd., Etc. ... · Niyam