Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-11-28

Nagendra Chandra Etc. Etc vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Nagendra Chandra Etc. Etc
Respondent
State Of Jharkhand & Ors
Author
B.N. Agrawal
Bench
B.N. Agrawal, Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appointments of the appellants as constables were made in violation of Rule 663(d) of the Bihar Police Manual, which mandates proper advertisement of vacancies. Citing the precedent in Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. Umadevi (3) & Ors., the Court established that appointments made in violation of recruitment rules are illegal under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to treat the dismissals as terminations, affirming the legality of the State's actions.

Nagendra Chandra Etc. Etc vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors · Niyam