Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-11-23

Union Of India & Ors vs Amar Singh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India & Ors
Respondent
Amar Singh
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the High Court which ruled that the respondent's service is governed by the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, and not by Rule 24 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Court found that the dismissal of the respondent was valid under Section 11(1) of the Act and Rule 27 of the CRPF Rules, 1955, but he was entitled to pensionary benefits as per Section 2 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The appeal by the Union of India was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions regarding the respondent's entitlements.

Union Of India & Ors vs Amar Singh · Niyam