Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-05-02

M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-II

Citation / case number
SC 2006/11828
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-II
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. SINHA & MARKANDEY KATJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the CESTAT's order regarding the demand for Central Excise duty under Section 11A of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The Court held that the manufacturing of Pre Stressed Concrete Girders (PSC Girders) constituted a process of manufacture, and the extended period of limitation was rightly invoked due to suppression of facts by the appellant. The Court affirmed the CESTAT's decision to impose duty but refrained from imposing penalties on the contracting party due to lack of mala fides.

M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-II · Niyam