Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-05-29

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH vs M/S. PEPSI FOODS LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2002/9660
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH
Respondent
M/S. PEPSI FOODS LTD.
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the CEGAT's decision that the demand for differential duty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was time-barred, as the show-cause notice was issued almost four years after the payment of differential duty. The Court found no evidence of suppression or mis-declaration by the assessee, which are necessary for extending the limitation period for duty demands. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to a refund of the excess amount paid, amounting to Rs.67,88,027/- paid on 28.11.1996.

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH vs M/S. PEPSI FOODS LTD. · Niyam