Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-05-09

U.P.S.R.T.C vs Ram Kishan Arora

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2007 SC 122
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P.S.R.T.C
Respondent
Ram Kishan Arora
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in substituting the punishment awarded by the disciplinary authority without sufficient grounds, as the respondent was found guilty of serious misconduct under the Road Transport Corporation Act. The Court emphasized that the commission of a criminal breach of trust is a serious misconduct, and the disciplinary authority's decision should not be interfered with lightly. The Court upheld the disciplinary action taken against the respondent, thereby reinforcing the authority of the disciplinary body in employment matters.

U.P.S.R.T.C vs Ram Kishan Arora · Niyam