Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-05-01

Rajendra Prabhu Chikane & Another Etc vs State Of Maharashtra Etc

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rajendra Prabhu Chikane & Another Etc
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra Etc
Author
Markandey Katju
Bench
S. B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of accused Sharad Chikane under Section 302 IPC for murder, affirming the Bombay High Court's decision which reversed the acquittal of accused Rajendra and Shashikant Chikane under Section 302/34 IPC. The Court emphasized that the presence of eyewitnesses and the established motive stemming from a boundary dispute were critical in affirming the guilt of all accused. The judgment reinforced the principle that circumstantial evidence, when corroborated by eyewitness testimony, can suffice for a conviction under murder charges.

Rajendra Prabhu Chikane & Another Etc vs State Of Maharashtra Etc · Niyam