Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-03-21

RAVI PRAKASH GOEL vs CHANRA PRAKASH GOEL

Citation / case number
SC 2006/9158
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAVI PRAKASH GOEL
Respondent
CHANRA PRAKASH GOEL
Author
ALTAMAS KABIR AR. LAKSHMANAN
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the appointment of an arbitrator is warranted when there is a valid arbitration agreement in place, as evidenced by the partnership deed's arbitration clause. The Court held that the refusal of the respondents to provide accounts constituted a dispute under the partnership agreement, thus necessitating arbitration. The dismissal of the appellant's application by the High Court was set aside, and the appointment of an arbitrator was ordered.

RAVI PRAKASH GOEL vs CHANRA PRAKASH GOEL · Niyam