Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-03-14

M/S. UMA SHANKAR KAMAL NARAIN vs M/S. M.D. OVERSEAS LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/10530
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. UMA SHANKAR KAMAL NARAIN
Respondent
M/S. M.D. OVERSEAS LTD.
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
S.H. KAPADIA DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court's decision to grant conditional leave to the appellants to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Court noted that the appellants' defense was deemed a 'moonshine defense' by the High Court, as it lacked substantial merit regarding the transaction and delivery of goods. The Court affirmed the High Court's order requiring the appellants to deposit the amount of Rs.39,30,856/- to the registry, with the condition that failure to do so would result in the decree becoming operative.

M/S. UMA SHANKAR KAMAL NARAIN vs M/S. M.D. OVERSEAS LTD. · Niyam