JAGVIR SINGH vs STATE (DELHI ADMN.)

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under Sections 342, 365, and 330 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming the High Court's decision which noted that the appellants had conceded to the conviction, focusing only on the quantum of sentence. The Court emphasized that if the appellants believed there was no concession, they should have addressed this issue before the High Court, as established in State of Maharashtra v. Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak. The appeal was dismissed, but the Court allowed for any future motions regarding the alleged concession to be considered by the High Court.