Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-07-27

INDRADEO PASWAN vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2006/24929
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
INDRADEO PASWAN
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN G.P. MATHUR
Bench
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN G.P. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the promotion and allocation of the appellant under the Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000, specifically referencing Section 72(2) of the Act. The Court held that the appellant's promotion to Additional Director (Mines) was valid and that his option for allocation to Jharkhand should be honored, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the provisions of the Reorganization Act. The Court ultimately directed the authorities to consider the appellant's case for allocation in light of his promotion and preference for Jharkhand, thereby upholding his rights under the Act.

INDRADEO PASWAN vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam