Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-07-27

M.C.D. vs QIMAT RAI GUPTA .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/726
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.C.D.
Respondent
QIMAT RAI GUPTA .
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the term 'made' in sub-section (4) of Section 126 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, determining it refers to the date when an order is communicated to the concerned parties, not merely when it is passed. The Court upheld the appellate authority's decision that the assessment order was time-barred as it was not communicated within the three-year limit stipulated by the Act. Consequently, the assessment was to revert to the existing rateable value prior to the invalid order.

M.C.D. vs QIMAT RAI GUPTA . · Niyam