Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-07-20

State Of U.P. & Anr vs Lalloo Singh

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2007 SC 350
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P. & Anr
Respondent
Lalloo Singh
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, D.K. Jain

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the jurisdiction of a Magistrate under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in relation to the seizure of property under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The Court held that the deletion of sub-section (2) of Section 50 of the Act does not affect the Magistrate's power to release seized articles, as the property must first be determined to have been used for an offence under Section 39 of the Act. The High Court's ruling that the Magistrate had jurisdiction was upheld, affirming the interpretation of the law regarding the release of seized property.

State Of U.P. & Anr vs Lalloo Singh · Niyam