Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-07-30

Commnr. Of Income Tax, Karnataka vs M/S. Canara Bank

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2007 SC 129
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commnr. Of Income Tax, Karnataka
Respondent
M/S. Canara Bank
Bench
S.H. Kapadia, B. Sudershan Reddy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that rediscounting interest paid on promissory notes does not constitute chargeable interest under Section 2(7) of the Interest-tax Act, 1974, as it arises from a diversion of title in favor of the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI). The Court clarified that the rediscounting charges collected by the assessee-bank from IDBI are not taxable as they do not accrue to the bank due to the overriding title of IDBI. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision.

Commnr. Of Income Tax, Karnataka vs M/S. Canara Bank · Niyam