Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-01-17

M/S. ENGINEER SYNDICATE vs STATE OF BIHAR .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/2294
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. ENGINEER SYNDICATE
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR .
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR AR.LAKSHMANAN
Bench
V.S. SIRPURKAR DR.AR.LAKSHMANAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal under the Arbitration Act, 1940, concerning an arbitration award made in favor of the appellant for Rs. 8,53,837. The Court held that the High Court erred in affirming the Subordinate Judge's decision to set aside the award on the grounds of it being non-speaking, emphasizing that under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, the court cannot review the merits of the arbitrator's decision. The judgment reiterated the principle established in Raipur Development Authority vs. M/s Chokhamal Contractors, which restricts judicial intervention in arbitration awards unless there is an error of law apparent on the face of the record.

M/S. ENGINEER SYNDICATE vs STATE OF BIHAR . · Niyam