Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-01-11

SECY. U.P. HIGH SCHOOL & INTERM.EDU.&ANR vs H.K.LAL

Citation / case number
SC 1999/17915
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SECY. U.P. HIGH SCHOOL & INTERM.EDU.&ANR
Respondent
H.K.LAL
Author
Order S.B. SINHA
Bench
S.B. SINHA & MARKANDEY KATJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the U.P. High School and Intermediate Education Board's refusal to alter the respondent's date of birth in his matriculation certificate was justified, as the matter was pending before the Appellate Court. The Court emphasized that writ jurisdiction is discretionary and should not be exercised when an alternative remedy exists, referencing the principle established in State of Punjab v. Mohinder Singh, [2005] 3 SCC 7. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision on both grounds of delay and merit.

SECY. U.P. HIGH SCHOOL & INTERM.EDU.&ANR vs H.K.LAL · Niyam