Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-02-27

RABINDRA CHANDRA PAUL vs COMMR.OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) SHILLONG

Citation / case number
SC 2006/22303
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RABINDRA CHANDRA PAUL
Respondent
COMMR.OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) SHILLONG
Author
B. SUDERSHAN REDDY S. H. KAPADIA
Bench
B. SUDERSHAN REDDY S. H. KAPADIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal under Section 130 E of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning the invocation of Rule 7A of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988. The Court held that the Department was not justified in invoking Rule 7A as there was no evidence to suggest that the declared price was tainted, and the appellant's declared price was consistent with the market price of similar goods. Consequently, the Court set aside the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, affirming the appellant's valuation of the imported goods.

RABINDRA CHANDRA PAUL vs COMMR.OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) SHILLONG · Niyam