Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-02-07

ANURAN RASTOGI vs STATE OF U.P

Citation / case number
SC 2006/17227
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANURAN RASTOGI
Respondent
STATE OF U.P
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Magistrate is not bound by the description of offences in the police report and can consider additional charges under Sections 406 and 307 IPC at the stage of framing charges. The Court found that the High Court's observations were contradictory and unnecessary after establishing that the proper stage for consideration is indeed the framing of charges. The appeal was disposed of, affirming the need for the Magistrate to evaluate the evidence before determining the trial court's jurisdiction.

ANURAN RASTOGI vs STATE OF U.P · Niyam