INDU BHUSHAN vs MUNNU LAL

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's application for restoration of appeal under Order XLI Rule 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, affirming the findings of valid service of notice. The Court referenced the precedent in State of M.P. v. Hiralal (1996 (7) SCC 523) to establish that the process server's evidence confirmed notice was served. The Court concluded that the High Court's decision was correct, as the appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the service of notice.