Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-02-27

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. vs PREMLAL

Citation / case number
SC 2003/17835
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP.
Respondent
PREMLAL
Author
B. SUDERSHAN REDDY S. H. KAPADIA
Bench
B. SUDERSHAN REDDY S. H. KAPADIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether Clause 49 of the 1956 Settlement was replaced by Clause 19 of the 1985 Settlement and a subsequent Resolution No.8856 dated 31.8.1978. The Court held that the Joint Committee's decision to revise the 1956 Settlement was valid under Clause 9 of the 1968 Settlement, thereby affirming the Corporation's stance that the daily wage system was abolished for employees who had worked for 180 days continuously. The appeals by the employer were allowed, confirming the legality of the revised settlement terms.

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. vs PREMLAL · Niyam