Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-02-01

INDER JEET KHURANA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
SC 1995/10015
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
INDER JEET KHURANA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Bench
G P MATHUR & R V RAVEENDRAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the Haryana Revenue (Group/B) Service Rules, 1988, particularly Rule 9 regarding recruitment methods for Tehsildars, which stipulates 40% by direct recruitment, 40% by promotion, and 20% by transfer. The Court held that the recruitment by transfer of certain Ziledars as Tehsildars violated the prescribed qualifications and experience requirements under Rule 7 and the selection process outlined in Rule 9. Consequently, the Court quashed the appointments made by transfer, reinforcing adherence to the statutory recruitment framework.

INDER JEET KHURANA vs STATE OF HARYANA · Niyam