Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-12-13

ACHHAIBAR MAURYA vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/31117
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ACHHAIBAR MAURYA
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Rule 29 of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, in relation to the age of superannuation for teachers, holding that a teacher born on July 1, 1943, would retire on June 30, 2003. The Court affirmed that the 'session's benefit' allows a teacher to continue until the end of the academic session if retirement occurs during that period. The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision that denied the extended service benefit.

ACHHAIBAR MAURYA vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam