Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-12-12

G.M., UCO BANK vs M. VENURANGANATH

Citation / case number
SC 2004/21653
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
G.M., UCO BANK
Respondent
M. VENURANGANATH
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
AFTAB ALAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court regarding the applicability of Clause 22 of the Manual on Disciplinary Action over Regulation 15(2) of the United Commercial Bank Regulations. The Court reiterated that acquittal in a criminal case does not preclude departmental proceedings, affirming that both operate in distinct legal realms. The Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the High Court's ruling that the respondent was entitled to salary and allowances during the suspension period as per the Manual's provisions.

G.M., UCO BANK vs M. VENURANGANATH · Niyam