Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-12-03

M/S. FEDDERS LLOYD CORPORATION LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI

Citation / case number
SC 2001/17648
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. FEDDERS LLOYD CORPORATION LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR ASHOK BHAN
Bench
V.S. SIRPURKAR ASHOK BHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal No. 8066-8068 of 2001, addressed the classification of split air-conditioners under Tariff Heading 84.15 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1944. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the appellant, Fedders Lloyd Corporation Ltd., was liable for central excise duty due to clandestine removal of split air-conditioners without payment of duty, amounting to Rs. 56,14,293/-. The Court confirmed the findings of the lower authorities regarding the manufacturing process and the appellant's role in the supply chain.

M/S. FEDDERS LLOYD CORPORATION LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI · Niyam