Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-12-07

U.P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORPN. LTD. vs KISAN UPBHOKTA PARISHAD .

Citation / case number
SC 2000/8644
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORPN. LTD.
Respondent
KISAN UPBHOKTA PARISHAD .
Author
MARKANDEY KATJU
Bench
MARKANDEY KATJU A. K. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the definition of 'agricultural implements' in the context of subsidies for Animal Driven Vehicles (ADV carts) under the U.P. Government order dated 20.11.1996. The Court held that ADV carts qualify as agricultural implements based on their definition in common parlance, thus allowing cane growers to purchase them from sources other than the U.P. State Agro Industrial Limited to avail subsidies. The judgment clarified the interpretation of terms used in government orders, emphasizing the need for common usage definitions unless specifically defined otherwise.

U.P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORPN. LTD. vs KISAN UPBHOKTA PARISHAD . · Niyam