Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-12-13

G.M., PENCH AREA, PARASIA,M.P. vs BARKAN

Citation / case number
SC 2000/2904
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
G.M., PENCH AREA, PARASIA,M.P.
Respondent
BARKAN
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the suit for specific performance under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is maintainable despite the defendants' claims. The Court found that the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their argument that the respondent's son had been employed, and thus upheld the High Court's decision. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the respondent's suit and set aside the lower court orders, allowing the appeal.

G.M., PENCH AREA, PARASIA,M.P. vs BARKAN · Niyam