Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-12-04

Sangam Spinners vs Regional Provident Fund ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 739
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sangam Spinners
Respondent
Regional Provident Fund ...
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan High Court's dismissal of the appellant's Special Appeal, affirming that Section 16(1)(d) of the Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952 was omitted with retrospective effect from 22.9.1997, thus denying the appellant's claim for exemption as a new factory after that date. The Court clarified that the entitlement to the benefits under the Act ceased post the amendment, despite the appellant's argument regarding the applicability of the infancy protection. The ruling reinforced the interpretation of legislative amendments and their retrospective implications on existing rights.

Sangam Spinners vs Regional Provident Fund ... · Niyam