Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-12-13

Achhaibar Maurya vs State Of U.P. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2008 SC (SUPP) 1649
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Achhaibar Maurya
Respondent
State Of U.P. & Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Rule 29 of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, which governs the age of superannuation for teachers, holding that a teacher born on July 1, 1943, would retire on June 30, 2003, and not be entitled to the 'session benefit' as claimed. The Court affirmed that the benefit of extended service must be conferred by statute, and the cut-off date for retirement is validly set by the legislature. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's decision.

Achhaibar Maurya vs State Of U.P. & Ors · Niyam