Ranju @ Gautam Ghosh vs Rekha Ghosh & Ors

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the second appeal regarding eviction under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. The Court found that the notice to quit was validly served, contrary to the trial court's findings, and established that the tenant violated clauses (m), (o), and (p) of Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, by causing nuisance and damage. Consequently, the Court affirmed the order for eviction and mesne profits, emphasizing the tenant's responsibility for maintaining the premises.