Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-30

A.P.S.R.T.C REP.BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER vs M.PENTAIAH CHARY

Citation / case number
SC 2007/1426
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A.P.S.R.T.C REP.BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER
Respondent
M.PENTAIAH CHARY
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application of the multiplier method under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing that the multiplier of '15' was appropriate given the claimant's age and loss of earning capacity due to a severe accident. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to increase the compensation awarded to the claimant, recognizing the structural formula for calculating damages as outlined in the Second Schedule of the Act. The judgment reinforced the principles established in General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Susamma Thomas regarding dependency and future earnings.

A.P.S.R.T.C REP.BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER vs M.PENTAIAH CHARY · Niyam