Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-24

M.C.CHAMARAJU vs HIND NIPPON RURAL INDUSTRIAL (P) LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/8888
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.C.CHAMARAJU
Respondent
HIND NIPPON RURAL INDUSTRIAL (P) LTD.
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE C.K. THAKKER
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE C.K. THAKKER

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Division Bench of the High Court erred in setting aside the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which had confirmed the appellant's entitlement to gratuity. The Court emphasized that the High Court should not have re-appreciated evidence when the authorities had already determined the facts. The Court reinstated the orders for payment of gratuity along with interest, affirming the appellant's rights under Section 4 of the Act.

M.C.CHAMARAJU vs HIND NIPPON RURAL INDUSTRIAL (P) LTD. · Niyam