Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-08

M/S. LOH VANIZYA UDYOG PVT. LTD. vs RICKIE KHOSLA

Citation / case number
SC 2006/4131
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. LOH VANIZYA UDYOG PVT. LTD.
Respondent
RICKIE KHOSLA
Bench
G.P. MATHUR & P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that an application under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC for permission to sue as an indigent person, pending for over 10 years, warrants reconsideration of ex-parte orders. The Court set aside the order dated 21.9.2000 that closed the appellant's rights to file a written statement, allowing the appeal on the condition that the appellant deposits Rs.10,000 as costs within one month. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring fair trial rights, allowing six weeks for the written statement to be filed thereafter.

M/S. LOH VANIZYA UDYOG PVT. LTD. vs RICKIE KHOSLA · Niyam