Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-17

TAX RECOVERY OFFICER CENTRAL RANGE-1 vs CUSTODIAN APPOINTED UNDER,SPL.COURT &ORS

Citation / case number
SC 2005/16505
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TAX RECOVERY OFFICER CENTRAL RANGE-1
Respondent
CUSTODIAN APPOINTED UNDER,SPL.COURT &ORS
Author
G.P. Mathur
Bench
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN G.P. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals filed under Section 10 of the Special Courts (Trial Of Offences Relating To Transactions In Securities) Act, 1992, challenging the Special Court's order rejecting the Tax Recovery Officer's intervention applications. The Court held that the Special Court correctly determined that recovery orders against a third party not notified under the Act were not maintainable. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Special Court's decision regarding the distribution of sale proceeds without prioritizing the income tax department's claims.

TAX RECOVERY OFFICER CENTRAL RANGE-1 vs CUSTODIAN APPOINTED UNDER,SPL.COURT &ORS · Niyam