Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-30

Indian Bank & Anr vs N. Venkatramani

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 3159
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Indian Bank & Anr
Respondent
N. Venkatramani
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, H.S. Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'broken period' in the context of pension eligibility under the Indian Bank Employee's Pension Regulation, 1995, specifically Regulation 28. The Court held that the respondent, having completed 14 years, 9 months, and 17 days of service, was entitled to pension benefits despite not meeting the 15-year requirement, as the High Court's ruling was justified in granting pension and interest on arrears from the date of superannuation. The Court affirmed the Division Bench's decision, emphasizing the need to consider the circumstances of the respondent's voluntary retirement.

Indian Bank & Anr vs N. Venkatramani · Niyam