Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-30
A.P.S.R.T.C. Rep. By Its Chief Law ... vs M. Pentaiah Chary
- Citation / case number
- AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 3141
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- A.P.S.R.T.C. Rep. By Its Chief Law ...
- Respondent
- M. Pentaiah Chary
- Author
- S.B. Sinha
- Bench
- S.B. Sinha, Harjit Singh Bedi
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court addressed the application of the multiplier method under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, determining that the High Court's application of a multiplier of '15' was appropriate given the claimant's age, earning capacity, and dependency of family members. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to grant additional compensation of Rs. 1,62,800/- to the claimant, emphasizing the need for a structured approach in calculating damages for loss of earning capacity due to permanent disability. The judgment reinforces the principles established in General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Susamma Thomas regarding the assessment of dependency and future earnings.