Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-17

Tax Recovery Officer,Central Range-1 vs Custodian The Special Court( ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 2935
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Tax Recovery Officer,Central Range-1
Respondent
Custodian The Special Court( ...
Author
G.P. Mathur
Bench
G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Special Court's order rejecting the Tax Recovery Officer's intervention applications under Section 10 of the Special Courts (Trial Of Offences Relating To Transactions In Securities) Act, 1992. The Court clarified that recovery orders against a third party not notified under the Act are not maintainable, reinforcing the principle that only notified parties' assets can be attached. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Special Court's jurisdiction and the validity of its proceedings.

Tax Recovery Officer,Central Range-1 vs Custodian The Special Court( ... · Niyam