Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-02

Pothula Rama Rao vs Pendyala Venakata Krishna Rao & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 2924
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pothula Rama Rao
Respondent
Pendyala Venakata Krishna Rao & Ors
Author
K. G. Balakrishnan
Bench
K. G. Balakrishnan, R. V. Raveendran, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision to strike off certain paragraphs of an election petition under Order VI Rule 16 CPC and subsequently dismiss the petition under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC, citing that the petition did not disclose any cause of action as per Sections 81, 83, 86, and 87 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The Court emphasized that the High Court had the jurisdiction to strike out pleadings at a preliminary stage if they were found to be unnecessary or frivolous. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling.

Pothula Rama Rao vs Pendyala Venakata Krishna Rao & Ors · Niyam