Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-08-08

M/S Loh Vanizya Udyog Pvt. Ltd vs Rickie Khosla & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 2859
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Loh Vanizya Udyog Pvt. Ltd
Respondent
Rickie Khosla & Anr
Author
G. P. Mathur
Bench
G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC, the prolonged pendency of an application for permission to sue as an indigent person, lasting over 10 years, warranted the setting aside of an ex-parte order against the defendant. The Court emphasized the importance of allowing the defendant to file a written statement, provided they deposit Rs.10,000 as costs within one month. The appeal was allowed, and the order dated 21.9.2000 was set aside, subject to the conditions imposed.

M/S Loh Vanizya Udyog Pvt. Ltd vs Rickie Khosla & Anr · Niyam