Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2007

Supreme Court of India · 2007-04-04

ACE PIPELINE CONTRACTS PVT. LTD. vs BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/7503
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ACE PIPELINE CONTRACTS PVT. LTD.
Respondent
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD.
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE A.K. MATHUR
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE A.K. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's dismissal of an application under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment of an arbitrator. The Court interpreted Clause 91 of the contract, which stipulated that disputes should be referred to an arbitrator appointed by the Director (Marketing) of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, and held that the clause was valid and binding. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming the appointment process outlined in the contract and dismissing the appeal.

ACE PIPELINE CONTRACTS PVT. LTD. vs BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD. · Niyam