Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-28

U.P.S.R.T.C. vs BIRENDRA BHANDARI

Citation / case number
SC 2006/4130
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P.S.R.T.C.
Respondent
BIRENDRA BHANDARI
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT & LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 33 C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a workman can claim only pre-existing benefits or those flowing from a pre-existing right. The Court found that the Labour Court and High Court erred in their interpretation, as the claim for arrears related to the 5th Pay Commission recommendations did not constitute a pre-existing right. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition, emphasizing the need for a proper reference to determine the nature of relief due to the workman.

U.P.S.R.T.C. vs BIRENDRA BHANDARI · Niyam